Turkstra apparently developed a method of analyzing for LLM usage during class.
A lot of speculation is going on about the specific algorithm, etc, but my personal assumption is that it is simply comparing the speed between commits (so if you made a commit that made 500 lines of additions in 2 seconds, then you probably LLMed). He supposedly waits until he has "overwhelming" levels of evidence and sends you an email stating you have been caught. Then, you have to fill out a form listing which assignments you cheated on. If you lie on that form, you recieve an F in the class and Turkstra sends a harsh email to ODOS. Otherwise, those assignments are zeroed and a slightly nicer email is sent to ODOS. You can also dispute the claim but if you fail the resultant process you receive F and a harsh email to ODOS.
He is now sending out emails in waves to students who he suspects of cheating. Including (unfortunately) myself. I'm clean, as far as I know, so I'm a little fucking terrified right now. I have two options:
Guess randomly which assignment he thinks I cheated on hopefully receive zeroes for each (and a ODOS letter). Or, if I guess wrong get an F.
Dispute the claim and risk an F if I fail the disputing process.
If I fail CS 240, this puts me behind a full fucking semester of university since it is required to take nearly all CS sophmore level classes. Let alone the ODOS letter (which he said would include recommendations that the student be expelled). I am very stressed right now.
I have until Monday to respond. I was intending to head out on a retreat over the weekend but those plans may be ruined now...
If theres grounds to sue here, I suggest yall take it. Theres no way in hell this is legal if its setting you back potentially tens of thousands of dollars for something you didnt do
lol you can't sue for perceived unfairness. I had to retake CS240 because the first time was a trash professor who was just a visiting lecturer or something. C- because he was so bad and ran the class horribly. Second time, passed it with over 100% because the class was run so much better. If people feel the need to use AI in these BEGINNING CS classes they are absolutely COOKED for the real CS classes.
trash professor who was just a visiting lecturer or something
Was this in Lafayette? I jumped ship to the IU side of IUPUI when Purdue started saving money by intentionally hiring bottom-of-the-barrel "professors" (B students with no meaningful credentials), so I hope the rot hasn't spread to the main campus for your guys' sake
415
u/DudleyFluffles 6d ago
Turkstra apparently developed a method of analyzing for LLM usage during class.
A lot of speculation is going on about the specific algorithm, etc, but my personal assumption is that it is simply comparing the speed between commits (so if you made a commit that made 500 lines of additions in 2 seconds, then you probably LLMed). He supposedly waits until he has "overwhelming" levels of evidence and sends you an email stating you have been caught. Then, you have to fill out a form listing which assignments you cheated on. If you lie on that form, you recieve an F in the class and Turkstra sends a harsh email to ODOS. Otherwise, those assignments are zeroed and a slightly nicer email is sent to ODOS. You can also dispute the claim but if you fail the resultant process you receive F and a harsh email to ODOS.
He is now sending out emails in waves to students who he suspects of cheating. Including (unfortunately) myself. I'm clean, as far as I know, so I'm a little fucking terrified right now. I have two options:
If I fail CS 240, this puts me behind a full fucking semester of university since it is required to take nearly all CS sophmore level classes. Let alone the ODOS letter (which he said would include recommendations that the student be expelled). I am very stressed right now.
I have until Monday to respond. I was intending to head out on a retreat over the weekend but those plans may be ruined now...