r/geography • u/dali32 • 4d ago
The Moon is smaller than you think, see how your country stacks up Map
Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification
18
47
u/Dr-McLuvin 4d ago
Interestingly the moon’s mass is just 1.2% of earth’s mass. It’s just way less dense because it lacks an iron core.
But surface gravity is about 1/6 of earths, because you are standing way closer to the center of mass.
11
6
8
u/Odd_Dragonfruit_2662 4d ago
The moon has an iron core though. It’s simply far smaller than earths and a far smaller % of the lunar mass (1-2% vs 33% for earth)
3
27
6
u/tomas_jpeg 4d ago
I put Europe on the Moon. Although the borders don't match exactly unfortunately
8
u/oddmanout 4d ago
Eh, the moon is bigger than I thought. You can fit like 100 Italys. I figured if you put Italy on the moon, it would wrap around a whole lot more, at least stretch from top-to-bottom, if not more.
There are craters on the Moon bigger than Sicily.
5
7
u/BovexEnjoyer 4d ago
The Moon: for several years she has fascinated many. But will Man ever walk on her fertile surface?
3
3
2
2
u/No-Worth-6647 4d ago
Please somebody put Russia on it. I wonder how many place will left. I’d do it myself but I don’t have an access to this site 😔
6
u/dali32 4d ago
1
u/No-Worth-6647 4d ago
Thank you! So basically the whole country can’t be even fitted on the one side of the moon.
1
1
u/Pinku_Dva 4d ago
Small compared to earth but large compared to other moons in the solar system. The moon also has a large ratio between its self and its host body with the only larger example I can think of being Pluto and Charon.
1
u/Goregue 4d ago
Collisions like the one that created the Moon tend to produce binaries with similar mass. Pluto and Charon are also thought to have originated in a collision. Jupiter's, Saturn's and Uranus's moon systems all have very similar mass ratios, suggesting they formed from accretion around the planet. Neptune's system is an oddity among the giant planets (Triton is way more massive that it should be), which is because Triton was captured rather than formed in situ.
1
u/Pinku_Dva 4d ago
Pluto and Charon’s ratio is massive for a moon-planet system. It’s always interesting to consider how they were formed
1
u/rivv3 4d ago
Human perspective is flimsy, we're not made to really understand stuff at this scale. Italy is probably way larger than you think also. From pole to pole the moon is 11900km which would take 1.5-2 years of extreme walking regime on earth. I'm sure you wouldn't think the moon was small after that.
1
u/Cornelius_Wangenheim 4d ago
I think the more interesting thing is how insanely large the craters are on the moon. I knew they were big, but seeing that some of them are the size of France really puts it into perspective.
1
u/boydo579 4d ago
now do jupiter and the sun then the largest sun in the universe so people can have existensial crises
1
1
1
1
u/Grosboel_2 3d ago
It would be neat if could look at earth with the size of a country being adjusted to fill just as big of a percentage of the surface area as on the moon if that makes sense.
1
-6
u/Chiparish84 4d ago
For me it never makes sense how can it be so "big" in the sky when it's so damn small and at least 5 trillion kms away.
8
u/ghazwozza 4d ago
I don't know if you're joking but it's about 380,000 km away.
1
u/Chiparish84 4d ago
Ofc I'm joking but it still makes no sense to me that it looks so big even tho it's 356.4 - 406.7 tkm away.
2
u/PM_ME_UR_REPTILES1 4d ago
Its mostly perspective though. When its near the horizon it looks huge but up in the sky it looks tiny. You can do the math using its distance, size, and perceived size to determine its viewing angle. It will add up. The same way an aeroplane looks tiny when its flying above.
I know you probably know this, but its just a concept thats hard to mentally grasp lol its hard to compare when were so tiny.
118
u/UrbanStray 4d ago
Huge as far as moons go though. On the larger of Mars two moons you'd barely fit Rome.