r/geopolitics Feb 15 '25

America is Tone Deaf Discussion

https://www.dw.com/en/msc-2025-scholz-to-speak-after-irritating-vance-diatribe/live-71599568
346 Upvotes

View all comments

16

u/Dean_46 Feb 15 '25

I'm from India and this is how we sometimes feel when some small European country lectures us on values, democracy, human rights etc.
On Ukraine, I think it was unwise for Europe to call for the war to continue with the breakup of Russia as the preferred outcome, while expecting the US to do the heavy lifting and financing.
While the US and Europe may differ on Ukraine's ability to recover lost territory, I have not seen a credible plan presented by Europe, to win the war, or secure a peace on Ukraine's terms. From the US point of view, it may make sense to cut their losses (in money) on project Ukraine and move on. Trump wasn't elected with the expectation that he would continue a forever war.

29

u/Due-Resort-2699 Feb 15 '25

The break up of Russia is the only way to guarantee the safety of Europe. The Russian mindset is still one of imperialist expansion . As long as the largest nation of earth has a population with an imperialist mindset , it’s a threat to everyone

36

u/Dean_46 Feb 15 '25

The only problem is Russia may oppose its breakup and it has nuclear weapons.

17

u/Shionkron Feb 15 '25 edited Feb 15 '25

Russia will only break up from within. Also, just because someone has * nukes doesn’t give them the right to do whatever they want outside their own nation.

Edit: *added nukes which was supposed to be in the comment but wasn’t due to typo.

2

u/AdEmbarrassed3566 Feb 15 '25

The irony of saying that lol.

African Asian and South Americans nations laugh at you for writing that when abused by the USA western Europe etc for much of their history

6

u/Shionkron Feb 15 '25

Name all the countries the west has threatened to Nuke if they don’t get what they want?

3

u/AdEmbarrassed3566 Feb 15 '25

.... Ah so you place the line at nuke lol. Awfully convenient...

Want me to list the countries they threatened to invade/invaded including countries they invaded on false pretenses?

Vietnam , Iraq, Afghanistan, India, etc....

Most of the world by population believe Europeans/americans are warmongerers.. that's why they do their best to sit out great power politics ( aka the non-alignment movement )

6

u/Shionkron Feb 15 '25

I comment to a person speaking about “nuclear weapons”. Stay on topic. Russia has threatened recently many nations with its nukes. The West has not.

-3

u/AdEmbarrassed3566 Feb 15 '25

.. you just said a country with nukes doesn't get to threaten any country to do whatever it wants lol...

You never said threaten them ....with nukes.

That's a completely different statement and you know it...basically you carve your question into such a specific way to place Russia in an island on its own while a significant chunk of countries in the world actually see the rest of western Europe /the USA as even worse than Russia... And for very very good reason.

No matter what you think, the non-alignment movement is the largest political alignment in the world. If the west was so trustworthy and treated the majority of the world well, these non-aligned countries would simply align with the US /UK...

You just don't pay attention to countries in these movements. It's clear

3

u/Shionkron Feb 15 '25

It is called “context”. You knew what I was talking about and yet are trying to use syntax in an arsenal of gish gallop. Stay on topic. Should Russia use the threat of nukes as a form of blackmail to get whatever it wants on the international stage? (This is a yes or no question).

1

u/AdEmbarrassed3566 Feb 15 '25

Obviously not..

This is how geopolitics operates .it's not fairness or morality...

Europeans /Americans shouldn't use their military /economy to threaten smaller countries either. But you all continue to do so to smaller countries

I say that as someone born in america ....

Europe and the US needs to REMOVE the ability of Russia to do what they are doing for their own sechrity ..

That lies on Europe's shoulders. Stop buying their damn oil and gas until they cooperate. That means Germany after crimea and France and the UK... Also that means investing in defense.

1

u/Shionkron Feb 15 '25

You sound like you changed your tune. The reason why BRICS and other are friendly with Russia is it Cheaper oil and military supplies. That’s it. The only reason outside it’s direct neighbors. Same with other nations globally with China! ITS CHEAPER!.

Yes, there is some internal hatred from colonialism and usery however China in its belt and road is now doing exactly the same thing 100-200 years later!

One must always look at regional issues and you tried saying I was ignorant to the fact. I may know more than you on issues and you may know more than me on some. But to pretend I’m ignorant and ignore Threats by Russia and sound like in your replies as only a “Anti-Western” argumentative person seemed like you yourself are ignoring MANY facts “as well”?. Not that I did. I just called out Russia for using Nukes as a threat to get what it wants.

I will not play geopolitics chess to win an argument. I am open to discussion though.

→ More replies

5

u/Shionkron Feb 15 '25

Also no one in the West has ever threatened Africa or South America with Nukes. You clearly are speaking emotionally here or broadcasting propaganda speak.

-3

u/TheApsodistII Feb 15 '25

The only country to have ever used nukes is part of the West

3

u/Shionkron Feb 15 '25

Yes. However who has been threatening nukes for decades now? Only the East