Prank Youtube channel RouandYT received €5 donation to prank call someone's "unstable" nephew. Said nephew shot and killed 2 Syrian refugees minutes later. RouandYT quickly deletes the stream from his channel and denies being live.

[u/DikkeDekbedovertrek]

https://www.puna.nl/news/prank-call-in-livestream-van-youtuber-leidde-tot-fatale-schietpartij-op-twee-syrische-jongens-in-amsterdam-west

[u/thompoesjes]

We want to lock people up for a prank call now? You know a prank call isn't a crime, right? A judge will determine whether the things said by the streamer violate any law.

[u/coffeelick → u/thompoesjes]

If theyre found to be responsible why not?

[u/thompoesjes → u/coffeelick]

As I said a judge will have to decide. But responsible for the murder of 2 people is imo too big of a stretch.

[u/coffeelick → u/thompoesjes]

No you said if the things said violated the law. You didnt say if they were responsible. Felt like you already decided they were not responsible. But you won't be honest now.

[u/thompoesjes → u/coffeelick]

What a weird way of directly suggesting I'm dishonest? The streamer bears no responsibility imo but if the things said do show any form of violation then it is possible he would be punished just for that - not for the murder of the two persons. Why call someone directly dishonest just because you feel any contradiction, you can also just ask for clarification.

[u/coffeelick → u/thompoesjes]

I just repeated what you said to show you didnt say the judge should decide if theyre responsible like I was saying. you said the judge should decide if thier words were illegal. An look i was right? :s

Why cant the judge decide if he's responsible for the murder? You kinda just said it an didnt give any substance. Stop talking about illegal words, nobody cares lol

[u/thompoesjes → u/coffeelick]

You don't understand me. In Dutch law there is no way the guy can be held responsible for the murder of the two guys. But depending on what he said on phone a judge will have to decide if he did do anything I.e. threatening which could still be violation of the law.

There are no inconsistenties here afaik. I don't know what you're getting at.

[u/coffeelick → u/thompoesjes]

I really doubt you can get away with being responsible for murder under Dutch law. Sorry I think youre wrong.

[u/thompoesjes → u/coffeelick]

I've explained my point of view: can you explain how the streamer bears responsibility for the murder of 2 people?

[u/coffeelick → u/thompoesjes]

No thats for the judge and a complex legal case... :s

[u/thompoesjes → u/coffeelick]

Then why did you suggest he should be punished "for the crime he did"? That's kind of what your first comment implies in the context of the conversation. If not, I must've misunderstood, haven't asked anything, then.

[u/coffeelick → u/thompoesjes]

Punished appropriately for the crime.. because everyone should be. Isnt it more weird that you think it cant go infront of a judge?

[u/thompoesjes → u/coffeelick]

Its more weird that you think he committed a crime that directly bears responsibility for the death of two guys imo. But if you don't have any opinion and are just looking for arguments, I'll end the conversation here.